COMPARISON OF INTUBATION QUALITY AND HAEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE IN ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION BETWEEN SUPERIOR LARINGEUS AND TRANSTRACHEAL BLOCK AND MUSCLE RELAXANTS

Authors

  • Hanggia Primadita Program Studi Anestesiologi dan Terapi Intensif Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta
  • Bhisma Murti Program Studi Magister Kedokteran Keluarga Fakultas Pasca Sarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta
  • Sugeng Budi Santosa Program Studi Anestesiologi dan Terapi Intensif Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta

Keywords:

Intubation, superior laryngeus, transtracheal, block

Abstract

Background. Endotracheal intubation stimulates various responses such as coughing and bucking, bronchial and laryngeal spasm and hemodynamic changes. Muscle relaxants facilitate easy intubation, but not suppressing hemodynamic response. Superior laryngeus and transtracheal block is presume to suppress hemodynamic changes while maintain intubation quality.
Objective. To compare intubation quality and hemodynamic response from superior laryngeus and transtracheal block and muscle relaxants.
Methods. Intubation quality is assessed using Helbo-Hansen Raulo and Trap Anderson. Blood Pressure, pulse and saturation were measured before and after intubation.
Results. All intubation is acceptable in muscle relaxants group (100%), one unacceptable in block group (5.9%). After intubation hemodynamic in both groups were significantly different (p=<0.05) for systolics (148.35±26.33 vs 109.53±15.98), diastolics (94.88±20.18 vs 68.00±15.54), MAP (109.65±21.18 vs 79.94±16.94), and for pulse (101.71±16.34 vs 87.47±20.03), except for saturation (99.35±0.79 vs 99.35±0.99).
Conclusion. Muscle relaxant and block deliver similar intubation quality, however block giving out better hemodynamic response stability.

References

Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ. Airway Management. In: Clinical Anesthesiology. 4th ed. USA: Lange Medical Books McGraw-Hill; 2006. p. 91–116

Rianawati, S., Aurora, H., & Nugrahanitya, Y. Correlation between Blood Pressure at Admitted Emergency Room and Clinically Outcome in Acute Thrombotic Stroke Patients. Malang Neurology Journal, 1(2), (2015). 68-71. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.mnj.2015.001.02.4

Smith P, Smith FJ, Becker PJ. Haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy with and without tracheal intubation. South African J Anaesth Analg. 2008;14(3):23–6

Miller RD. Pharmacology of Muscle Relaxants and Their Antagonists. In: Miller’s Anesthesia. 7th ed. USA: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2010. p. 859–912

Stoelting RK, Hillier SC. Neuromuscular Blocking Drugs. In: Handbook of Pharmacology and Physiology in Anesthetic Practice. Philadelphia, USA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2006. p. 212–49

Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ. Neuromuscular Blocking Agents. In: Clinical Anesthesiology. 4th ed. USA: Lange Medical Books McGraw-Hill; 2006. p. 205–26

Hadzic A. Regional and Topical Anesthesia for Endotracheal Intubation. In: Textbook of Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. USA: McGraw-Hill; 2006. p. 337–9

Kurniawan, S. Neuronal Signaling. Malang Neurology Journal, 1(2), (2015). 86-96. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.mnj.2015.001.02.7

DeMeester TR, Skinner DB, Evans RH, Benson DW. Local Nerve Block Anesthesia for Peroral Endoscopy. Ann Torac Surg. 1977;24(3):278–83

Vannier JL, Vilette M, Bouaziz H, Ibrahim H, Marty J, Desmonts JM. Le Bloc du nerf laryngé supérieur pour les endoscopies ORL. Description d’une technique simplifiée. Ann Fr Anesth Réanim. 1989;8:379–81

Gunawan AI, Gaus S, Bahar B. Effectiveness of Combination of Glossopharyngeal Block, Laryngeal Superrior Block, and Transtracheal Puncture to Attenuate Haemodynamic Response dur to Endotracheal Intubation. In: 9th National COngress of Indonesia Society of Anesthesiologist Handbook. 2010. p. 455–73

Murti B. Ukuran Sampel untuk Mean. In: Desain dan Ukuran Sampel untuk Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif di Bidang Kesehatan. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press; 2010. p. 110–26

Shaikh SI, Bellagali VP. Tracheal Intubation without Neuromuscular Block in Children. Indian J Anesth. 2010;54(1):29–30

Patil V, Barker GL, Harwood RJ, Training NMW, Xue FS, Topical SA. Regional and Topical Anaesthesia for Endotracheal Intubation. Anesth Analg [Internet]. 2009;89(4). Available from: http://scholar.google.com/scholarhl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Regional+and+Topical+Anaesthesia+for+Endotracheal+Intubation#0

Sivakumar RK, Rajasekar R, Sellappan P, Anandan H. Efficacy of Bilateral Superior Laryngeal Nerve Block for Diagnostic Direct Laryngoscopy. 2017;4(1):133–5

Sethi N, Tarneja VK, Madhusudanan TP, Shouche S. Local anaesthesia for fiberoptic intubation: A comparison of three techniques. Med J Armed Forces India. 2005;61(1):22–5

Downloads

Published

2018-04-13

How to Cite

Primadita, H., Murti, B., & Santosa, S. B. (2018). COMPARISON OF INTUBATION QUALITY AND HAEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE IN ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION BETWEEN SUPERIOR LARINGEUS AND TRANSTRACHEAL BLOCK AND MUSCLE RELAXANTS. MNJ (Malang Neurology Journal), 4(2), 72–77. Retrieved from https://mnj.ub.ac.id/index.php/mnj/article/view/344

Issue

Section

Research Article